Home > current events, news, sports > Alex Rodriguez, You Still Have My Vote

Alex Rodriguez, You Still Have My Vote

Yes, Alex Rodriguez was screwed by undisclosed sources, Selena Roberts of Sports Illustrated, and the MLBPA union on Saturday, February 7th, 2009.

That date will be considered by some as when baseball died.  How is this the case?  Is Alex Rodriguez the first player to admit steriod use?  Was he ever considered ‘the savior’ to the game?  Since Saturday, it seems like he was the first player to admit his usage, and he was the savior to baseball, a game that is thriving in this economy.

When Jose Canseco wrote his book , Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant ‘Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big, mentioning Mark McGwire, Rafael Palmiero, Ivan Rodriguez, Jason Giambi, and Juan Gonzalez; people thought he was nuts.  Giambi late admitted that he used steroids, Palmiero was caught and suspended for testing positive, McGwire is considered guilty in the court of public opinion, Gonzalez was listed in the Mitchell Report, and (Ivan) Rodriguez had denied all accusations.

That led the way for Vindicated, the sequel to Canseco’s first book.  This one implicated Alex Rodriguez and Albert Belle.  Vindication occurred this past Saturday.

Why should we care?

Only Palmiero ever tested for a banned substance.  The other players either tested positive or admitted use of substances that are now banned by MLB prior to the drugs being banned.  What these players did or are accused of doing was not wrong within MLB’s rules at the time.

Let’s mention one of the larger injustices of this story: the test that Alex Rodriguez was involved in was a ‘survey’ that MLB wanted done to see if there was a steroids issue within the game.   The players tested were promised complete anonimity.

In 2003, when the tests were given, assuming 25 players per team, there were 750 players in MLB; 104 tested positive for steroids.  This means 13.86% of baseball was ‘jucing’.   Does that sound like steroids were rampant throughout MLB?  This was a high enough number where MLB and the MLBPA decided to ban certain substances beginning in 2005.  Everyone in 2003 would be in the clear, since they were not doing anything wrong.

If no one was doing anything wrong, why are we treating people like Alex Rodriguez like criminals?

I can see why in an interview with Katie Couric, Rodriguez denies using steriods.  Yes, he was lying.  Who would have ever known that he was?  His positive test was sealed, confidential, to be destroyed, and never to be heard about again.  The test results were received by the union on November 11, 2003, finalized two days later, and players were notified the following day.

According to MLBPA union leader Donald Fehr, “promptly thereafter, the first steps were taken to begin the process of destruction of the testing materials and records.  On November 19, however, we leardned that the government had issued a subpoena.  Upon learning this, we concluded, of course, that it would be improper to proceed with the destruction of the materials.”  The government wanted the test results as part of the BALCO investigation into performance-enhancing drugs.

Fehr also said there was only an ‘eight-day span between receipt of the test results and notice that a federal grand jury was seeking the results’, which did not give the union enough time to destroy the test results.

How is eight days not enough time to destroy documents, test results, samples, and any other evidence that would implicate its players?

Because of the current fallout on Alex Rodriguez, and the potential fallout on the other 103 players that may follow, and the ‘guarantee’ of anonimity that was promised and not followed through on, good luck on getting the MLB players to agree to anything that is promised as anonymous ever again.

The whole steroids and PED fiasco that has been a part of baseball for the last decade, to some, has tainted the game.  Many Hall-of-Fame voters have said that they would not vote in anyone involved in the steroid cheating scandal.  Cheaters in the past have been punished: ‘Shoeless’ Joe Jackson and his ‘Black Sox’ teammates and Pete Rose are the most prominent names.  The glaring difference between the ‘Black Sox’ and Rose,  and Alex Rodriguez, the ‘Black Sox’ and Rose broke existing rules of MLB.  What do we do about players that admit using drugs/PED’s that are now banned?

Mike Schmidt, hall-of-fame third baseman for the Philadelphia Phillies is a member of the 500 hr club, and on the All-Century team.  Since his retirement in 1988, Schmidt has come out and admitted his use of ‘greenies’ otherwise known as amphetamines (speed).  A trial in the 1980’s implicated Willie Stargell (hall-of-famer), teammate Bill Madlock, and Willie Mays (hall-of-famer).  The use of amphetamines in baseball has been common for decades, and was made notorious in Jim Bouton’s 1970 tell-all “Ball Four,” in which Bouton described how players had easy access to the green-colored speed pills.  Greenies were banned by MLB in 2006, with the first positive test resulting in a warning ans the second positive test bringing a 25-game suspension.

What do amphetamines do for a baseball player?  MLB teams play 162 games in roughly 180 days.  No matter how in shape a player is, the body breaks down.  Some players felt that if they don’t play, they may lose their job.  The green pills keep the body going for short periods of time, allowing players to keep up with the demanding schedule.  And people wonder why Cal Ripken Junior’s consecutive games streak of 2,632 was so amazing.

If we are willing to punish players that tested positive for steroids or PED’s when they were not banned in MLB by not voting them into the Hall-of-Fame, shouldn’t we remove players that have admitted past use?  If that does not happen, people need to get over the last decade.  Do not add an asterisk to any records set in this era; we do not know what really happened in the 80’s, 70’s, 60’s, and prior.

I am still a fan of baseball, and still a fan of Alex Rodriguez.  If he breaks Bonds’ career homerun total of 762, he will be the rightful owner of that record.  After his career is done, hopefully he will join Barry Bonds, all the other greats with questionable backgrounds in the Hall-of-Fame.  Rodriguez has my vote… if I ever get one.

~Jason Douglas

twitter: @jasondouglas

Advertisements
  1. llabesab
    February 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM

    There’s an old adage in sports which the Yankees should heed. “..If you can’t win with a “Super=star” on the team, might as well get rid of him. You’re no worse off and you have an extra $20million per year in the bank.”

  2. mdbirdlover
    February 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM

    You bring up some good points.
    This issue has been clouding the game for some time. How do you think MLB can move past it.
    Me, personally, I don’t think A-Rod should be getting punished for this at a time when it wasn’t illegal. That onus rests on MLB. These documents were supposed to be anonymous.
    You can’t blame the reporter for breaking this story. It should highlight the prevalence of it.

    Be assured though that right now some freaky smart chemist is working the juice to come up with a new batch of undetectable stuff to give these guys the edge.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: